<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VisualJournalism - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-bec120bb" type="application/json"/><link>http://visualjournalism.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://visualjournalism.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:19:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The programme is ready for Malofiej 20</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/the-programme-is-ready-for-malofiej-20/2012/02/13/#comment-438042565</link><description>This is very kind of you, Gert. Thanks for the nice words</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alberto Cairo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:19:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Crimescene Infographic &amp;#8211; How was Ötzi killed?</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/crimescene-infographic-how-was-otzi-killed/2011/10/25/#comment-362491340</link><description>didnt they do another earlier version of this?&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2007/07/iceman/iceman-photography" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://ngm.nationalgeographic....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;illustrated by the amazing (and sadly departed) Kazuhiko Sano?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maxgadney</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 16:54:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The barchart that doesn&amp;#8217;t explain anything and isn&amp;#8217;t news</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/the-barchart-that-doesnt-explain-anything-and-isnt-news/2011/10/22/#comment-361741454</link><description>Nice post&lt;br&gt;An alternative of the Mc Candless visualization here &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://public.tableausoftware.com/views/IncomeInequality-TheGiniCoefficient/Incomeinequality" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://public.tableausoftware....&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephane Nardin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 04:24:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The barchart that doesn&amp;#8217;t explain anything and isn&amp;#8217;t news</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/the-barchart-that-doesnt-explain-anything-and-isnt-news/2011/10/22/#comment-361169034</link><description>"MAYBE THIS GRAPHIC appeals to the purists out there? The ones who think that everything can be explained in a barchart?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) Nothing by McAndless appeals to the purists&lt;br&gt;2) I don't know of any purist who would ever promote the idea that everything is best explained by a bar chart.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And most importantly&lt;br&gt;3) this is the saddest excuse for a bar chart I have yet seen. &lt;br&gt;It is a useless graphic that does not illustrate it's point (or facilitate its stated purpose), is absurdly large and convoluted by it's poor use of color, it's purposeless dual-direction set up and the nonsensical bubble in the center of each bar.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This graphic is pointless in every sense, which is a shame for a chart that was purportedly intended to clarify what were some pretty sound statistical graphs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jamie Briggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:53:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Advice from a successful infographic salesperson &amp;#8211; let the fight begin</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/advice-from-a-successful-infographic-salesperson-let-the-fight-begin/2011/10/19/#comment-342861380</link><description>To make it even worse (for me) I just realize that Don'ts is a correct way to spell the headline. I have updated the article. &lt;br&gt;1-0 to Amy even if I'm not really fighting her, as she has come totally clean in the comments to her own article and admits that what she is doing is meant as linkbait. Had she called her article 'Do's and Don'ts Of Linkbait-Infographics' I think it would have been perceived differently in the community. She is the expert in linkbait after all and holds an important voice for that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gert K Nielsen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:56:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Advice from a successful infographic salesperson &amp;#8211; let the fight begin</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/advice-from-a-successful-infographic-salesperson-let-the-fight-begin/2011/10/19/#comment-341269651</link><description>Sure, I had read the article and I too winced - I'm glad it's prompted such debate. I work for a publishing company, and lately we've had a spate of public relations people phoning up hawking 'infographics' committing many of the same sins (often including basic mathematical errors). So let the fight begin indeed. Sorry, I was a little cranky in that earlier comment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rich Harris</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:11:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Advice from a successful infographic salesperson &amp;#8211; let the fight begin</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/advice-from-a-successful-infographic-salesperson-let-the-fight-begin/2011/10/19/#comment-340128691</link><description>Thanks for the protip, Rich. 'Success' in Danish - my mothertongue - is spelled 'Succes' with just a single 's', so I am prone to making that mistake. &lt;br&gt;That said - I don't believe in the notion that you can't critizise anything or offer advice before being perfect yourself. Exactly the reason I think it's important to read Amys article, which I recommend as solid advice with bad examples.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gert K Nielsen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:35:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Advice from a successful infographic salesperson &amp;#8211; let the fight begin</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/advice-from-a-successful-infographic-salesperson-let-the-fight-begin/2011/10/19/#comment-340070759</link><description>Protip: When ridiculing the spelling in someone else's headline, check your own first. 'Succesful' indeed...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rich Harris</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:47:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Infographics could change your political views</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/infographics-could-change-your-political-views/2011/09/24/#comment-339494174</link><description>Hi Gert. Thank you, but I already saw that. I was trying to find out in which journal the article was published?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicklas Pape</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:59:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Infographics could change your political views</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/infographics-could-change-your-political-views/2011/09/24/#comment-339301645</link><description>Nicklas, there is a link in the 13th line of text. 'Opening the Political Mind' - set in blue. Or you can click here: &lt;a href="http://www.dartmouth.edu/~nyhan/opening-political-mind.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.dartmouth.edu/~nyha...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gert K Nielsen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:58:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Infographics could change your political views</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/infographics-could-change-your-political-views/2011/09/24/#comment-338336061</link><description>Where are the paper published?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicklas Pape</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:35:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Osama Bin Ladens Death in Infographics &amp;#8211; Gallery</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/osama-bin-ladens-death-in-infographics-gallery/2011/05/04/#comment-336765638</link><description>Just came across your page. Thanks a lot for this excellent piece! Stefan Heijnk</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sheijnk</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:17:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Care to explain how a Mega Shark can take a Boeing 747 down?</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/care-to-explain-how-a-mega-shark-can-take-a-boeing-747-down/2010/02/24/#comment-277542496</link><description>Its not 'too much research'. And its not a 'good story'. That said; why bother picking a piece of crap apart?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cabbawabba</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:34:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Details about the Malofiej19 Golden Graphics in Print</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/details-about-the-malofiej19-golden-graphics-in-print/2011/03/26/#comment-247538995</link><description>thank you</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">matbaa</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 02:57:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enough with the non-factual Breaking News Graphics</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/enough-with-the-non-factual-breaking-news-graphics/2011/05/09/#comment-246995163</link><description>There are too many infographics that ignore both reliable information and truth.&lt;br&gt;Those should only be allowed on the Colbert Report &lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alan Gray</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:06:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Osama Bin Ladens Death in Infographics &amp;#8211; Gallery</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/osama-bin-ladens-death-in-infographics-gallery/2011/05/04/#comment-229999436</link><description>I hope you like this one as well &lt;a href="http://namesake.com/blog/2011/05/infographics/a-breakdown-of-the-takedown-osamas-last-hour/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://namesake.com/blog/2011/...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jasonlankow</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2011 17:50:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death of Datavisualization in the News</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/the-death-of-datavisualization-in-the-news/2011/03/31/#comment-205497340</link><description>I couldn't agree more. How did this trend of data visualisation ever occur in the first place? What are its origins? I've never been a fan and felt like an outsider for a couple of years as papers jumped onto this wholly untried and untested trend. I wasn't allowed to not like them. It wasn't "cool" to do so. They might look nice but you need a hell of a lot of patience to be bothered to get the facts out of them. Most readers, I suspect, don't spend that amount of time sifting through the data. That's not their job. It't ours.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ninian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 19:35:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Death of Datavisualization in the News</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/the-death-of-datavisualization-in-the-news/2011/03/31/#comment-204372199</link><description>Gert, did you mean "News" (as in the headline) or "Journalism" as a whole (as the rest of the article implies)?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm asking because I don't see a lot of data visualization in the News. And that might be for good reasons. News are fast. Datavis (creation and reception) often takes time. We are glad when we find a good example for a bar chart depicting the month's unemployment rates.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you talk about journalism as a whole and you're saying that data visualization won't be a part of journalism in the future, then I think you have a very narrow understanding of journalism. Philipp Roberts mentioned it: Some have already begun to augment journalism by publishing complete data sets, with or without visualization. Making pictures out of it (be it still, animated or interactive) is only one way to make use of that data. In fact The Guardian leverages the growing willingness of the end users to engage in the storytelling and fact finding themselves. They - your customers - can reuse that data in purposes the journalists don't necessarily think of.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think that journalism has to change, and so it does. Journalists have to be more open about their sources, because end users want to check them. Publishing raw data in a digestible way is not storytelling, but it is part of a more transparent journalism.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marian Steinbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 04:01:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Osama Bin Ladens Death in Infographics &amp;#8211; Gallery</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/osama-bin-ladens-death-in-infographics-gallery/2011/05/04/#comment-200343015</link><description>Another big loser is Counter Terrorism Chief, John Brennan, who as far as I can tell, deliberately lied to the face of the journalists in order to advance his propaganda of bin Laden to be a sorry excuse of a man hiding in luxury behind a woman.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gert K Nielsen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 14:20:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Osama Bin Ladens Death in Infographics &amp;#8211; Gallery</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/osama-bin-ladens-death-in-infographics-gallery/2011/05/04/#comment-200341208</link><description>Hi Ninian - you have a lot of good examples too. The Dutch frontpage is an editorial illustration, and as such they have free hands, although the decision to run it on Breaking News Day is rather stoned-out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everyone is allowed to put images and links in their comments.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gert K Nielsen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 14:16:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Osama Bin Ladens Death in Infographics &amp;#8211; Gallery</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/osama-bin-ladens-death-in-infographics-gallery/2011/05/04/#comment-200340402</link><description>Hi Anibal. Infographics like this, which aim to show a very specific location, is in my opinion about 3D and good rendering - also -. That's the beauty of it: Info and Graphics combined.&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gert K Nielsen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 14:15:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Osama Bin Ladens Death in Infographics &amp;#8211; Gallery</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/osama-bin-ladens-death-in-infographics-gallery/2011/05/04/#comment-200149017</link><description>You missed out the Dagblad De Pers page one offering – probably the funniest treatment I saw. You can see it here by scrolling down my blog from last week,&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://graphicgibbon.blogspot.com/2011/05/got-im.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://graphicgibbon.blogspot....&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ninian Carter</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 10:26:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Osama Bin Ladens Death in Infographics &amp;#8211; Gallery</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/osama-bin-ladens-death-in-infographics-gallery/2011/05/04/#comment-198807292</link><description>Nice post for good research of other's works. Beyond that, i agree with Alberto, infographics isn't about more 3d or more good renders, is about information.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anibal maiz caceres</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 17:47:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Osama Bin Ladens Death in Infographics &amp;#8211; Gallery</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/osama-bin-ladens-death-in-infographics-gallery/2011/05/04/#comment-198037055</link><description>This post makes me feel hopeless. We are back in the 80s when all that mattered to too many editors and graphics people were explosions and 3D arrows with tacky gradients. Among all these, only a handful can be considered true visual journalism. The others are just sensationalistic fiction</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alberto Cairo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 18:44:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Osama Bin Ladens Death in Infographics &amp;#8211; Gallery</title><link>http://visualjournalism.com/osama-bin-ladens-death-in-infographics-gallery/2011/05/04/#comment-197027408</link><description>Great collection!&lt;br&gt;What about online infographics: I send you one  ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2011/graficos/may/s1/Osama.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Alameda Bernal</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 14:33:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
